Digg

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

Fox Hosts Outraged Al Qaeda Might Watch C-SPAN

rawstory.com — Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade claimed to be upset at the notion that Al Qaeda may be watching hearings about Bush Administration interrogation policies that aired on C-SPAN. Kilmeade says he believes that Al Qaeda may target David Addington for his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. So much for open government. Can you say LAME?

Bury

alapoet 54 days ago, made popular 54 days ago

1005 diggs
digg it

191 Comments
Who Dugg It?
Blog It
Email It

ti22, on 06/28/2008, -7/+26love this.
- nycmac247, on 06/28/2008, -3/+8yeah, he's a PROFESSIONAL *****
  - haydesigner, on 06/28/2008, -1/+8"Fox Hosts Outraged Al Qaeda Might Watch Fox, Threaten to take Simpsons Off the Air"
    
    Can't allow the chance that Al Qaeda might actually laugh at something, Bill O'Reilly says.
- mikelieman, on 06/28/2008, -1/+8"Loyal Bushies" like Addington and Fox News are first and foremost, cowards.
  
  So it's not surprising these guys would panic about another non-existent threat. Given that Al Qaeda is their shorthand for anyone who *isn't* a Loyal Bushie, it's pretty clear why they're paranoid and delusional.
- ELCad, on 06/29/2008, -1/+2It is truly awesome.
  
  Now I can be Outraged at FOX for tipping off Al Qaeda to the secrets of C-SPAN.
- darkciti2, on 06/29/2008, -1/+3I can spell LAME: F-O-X
alapoet, on 06/28/2008, -11/+138Every time I think, "OK, Fox News can't possibly get any stupider," they prove me wrong.

Oh well, what do I know? I'm a liberal.
- rapcrap187, on 06/28/2008, -1/+35And theres actually people out there who soak this up and believe in it.
- mrmontrose, on 06/28/2008, -1/+36Watch Fox, I watch it all the time, i helps me embarrass my conservative friends.
  - CryRightardCry, on 06/30/2008, -1/+2Watch out, it will make you as dumb as a right winger.
- ozid, on 06/28/2008, -16/+1I agree with you, but I'm not a liberal. I suppose the biggest difference between liberals and I, is that I was let in on the secret that "stupider" is not a word. :)
  - deathyepl, on 06/28/2008, -1/+17Huh. The dictionary appears to disagree with you.
    
    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupider
    
    Next time you make a stupid statement, you might want to check your references first.
  - rayfiend, on 06/28/2008, -1/+13ozid, That should be "between liberals and me" --- plus what deathyepl said.
  - lennybird, on 06/28/2008, -7/+3I guess the difference between me, liberals and conservatives is that I could care less whether it's spelled "more stupid," or "stupider" - I know what he meant.
  - jrburkh, on 06/28/2008, -0/+8Actually, the phrase you are looking for would be, "couldn't care less".
    
    Sincerely,
    The Proper English Police (Who Also Screws Things Up On Occasion)
  - lennybird, on 06/29/2008, -3/+1That's assuming I meant to say I couldn't care less. I knew exactly what I was typing. Rather, it was a lack of understanding regarding to the phrase - neither a grammar nor vocabulary error.
  - CryRightardCry, on 06/30/2008, -1/+1@Lennybird
    So you are saying it wasn't a mistake in grammer or spelling, you are just dumb?
- RajDhillon, on 06/28/2008, -1/+13I'm a conservative and I hate fox news...
  
  Just kidding, Liberal all the way.
  - infinitus64, on 06/28/2008, -1/+6i see what you did there.
  - ispshadow, on 06/29/2008, -0/+1It was even better that I had to scroll up to see the "Just kidding, Liberal all the way."
    
    Awesome, I actually chuckled.
- fragout36, on 06/28/2008, -11/+3Why do Libs always attack FOX. Yeah they may be biased, but so are liberal news stations like CBS. If its not right one way then its not right both ways. Thus the whole double standard issue. You know just the other day a Liberal politician said Barack OSAMA instead of Obama, but no one made a fuss. Let me tell you, if that was a Republican he would have been hung politically.
  
  Oh well, what do I know I'm just Republican.
  - carpespasm, on 06/28/2008, -0/+8Link to politician calling him Barack Osama?
  - noen, on 06/28/2008, -1/+3On the other hand. If it's right for conservative extremists to bash liberals then we have the right to do the same. The problem is that the moment a liberal talks back with any force you all get the vapors and start clutching your pearls.
    
    But I don't even watch TV. It's all wingnut territory as fas as I am concerned.
  - fragout36, on 06/28/2008, -3/+1http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/24/chris-mat ...
    
    Whoops, I'm sorry I wasn't correct, Chris Matthews called, Osama Bin Laiden Obama.
    
    In any case if that was a Republican he would have been in deep *****.
  - fragout36, on 06/28/2008, -1/+2@Noen
    
    Two wrongs don't make a right.
    
    It's not right to bash either side. And the Liberals can say anything they want because right now when Liberals hears Republican they automatically dislike them. I apologize for the way George Bush acted in office, but it doesn't make all of us like him.
  - noen, on 06/28/2008, -0/+7But I'm not saying it's wrong fragout. It's ok for the right to criticize the left and it's also ok for us to criticize the ***** crazy right. You're just whining because it'll be another 40 years before any sane person lets the right get within a mile of the levers of power.
  - fragout36, on 06/28/2008, -0/+0Noen, I'm not whining, I'm simply trying to point out that both parties are at fault for hard feelings thats all, and that we should agree to disagree.
  - GunnerMan, on 06/28/2008, -2/+1Noen you guys complain the right can bash the left all they want but when the left bashed the right we get our panties in a tizzy? Thats interesting since Rightwing leaders such as Rush Limbaugh critisize republicans for NOT standing up for themselves. I am guilty, I live in a VERY liberal area and I keep my mouth shut because I know you people can not have a meaningful conversation about anything political, you just get angry and you exemplify my point by throwing in the "***** crazy right" comment. Most of the time the left can not comment back with any force anyway lol. "***** crazy right," yeah throw that in the most intelligent of comments and it will make the comment loose most of it's value to the reciever. Can't you guys talk like normal people, it would be a lot mroe fun to talk to you guys then.
    
    There are nonsense people on both sides who do bash the other side and expect nothing in return but but saying the right is more guilty than the left is false. Just remeber your normal American republican is as normal as they come. You don't ever ever look at politicians as a definition of the party. You look at the people.
  - mikelieman, on 06/29/2008, -0/+6CBS is owned by WESTINGHOUSE, and clearly not a "Liberal" station.
    
    DEMOCRACY NOW is an example of the "Liberal" train of thought. Let's see... Nope... Nothing even remotely like it on CBS.
- BeefBaron, on 06/29/2008, -1/+8I love how Americans can so easily be divided up into liberals and conservatives, two terms which mean almost nothing, but are used as an excuse for all kinds of stupidity.
- shakbhaji, on 06/29/2008, -0/+1That was actually mind numbing.
arielh85, on 06/28/2008, -10/+13wow. really.
- memper, on 06/28/2008, -1/+2ya rly.
allowners, on 06/28/2008, -10/+70I outraged that Fox provides fuel for traitors to our country.
- altgeeky1, on 06/28/2008, -2/+14Dugg, for the delicious irony.
- Observer001, on 06/29/2008, -1/+3I outraged! I SMASH!
- Micktion, on 06/29/2008, -1/+9Fox is right!!
  
  You people just aren't scared enough.
  
  You should watch Fox more then you'll be scared enough and recognise who the real patriots are.
  
  (yes this is sarcasm)
  - PhilLesh69, on 06/29/2008, -1/+2You're right. If we all just watched Fox News Channel, we'd all be demanding that C-Span be shut down immediately. We'd also demand that the government go underground and stop being so open and free.
    
    Because this is an existential threat from islamo-fascists who hate us for our freedoms!
    
    Those of us who still don't buy into the whole fear-based politics keep thinking that their way of thinking is cowardice, but if we would just watch Fox News Channel, we'd all understand that cowardice is the new patriotism.
corbettkroehler, on 06/28/2008, -7/+27It's a shame that such xenophobia is effective because it frightens me.
- Micktion, on 06/29/2008, -0/+2You just have to push through that fear barrier, then you'll reach a state of blissful content for your political leaders to do whatever it takes to keep you safe. If that fails just turn to god and wait for the rapture :)
techguru2006, on 06/28/2008, -14/+58someone actually watches C-SPAN?
- ufia, on 06/28/2008, -4/+15That's nothing. Fox News haters are their most loyal viewers. But they will tell you they never watch MSM, in fact, they don't even own a TV.
- bjornski, on 06/28/2008, -5/+21I do.
  
  What's your point?
  - TexasShiv, on 06/28/2008, -24/+6That you're probably a virgin
  - snassiri, on 06/28/2008, -3/+29Yeah, someone who cares to see for himself about how his elected officials are running the country rather than just reading whatever snippets appear on Digg is surely a pathetic loser who can never get laid. You disgrace the name of Texas.
  - jrburkh, on 06/28/2008, -13/+4Texas - dugg for being a sarcastic *****.
    Snass - buried for being an uptight dickwad without a sense of humor.
    
    Bury me, I don't care. Life is a joke, enjoy.
  - Pillage, on 06/29/2008, -7/+1How do you get cable on the commune?
  - Wartyboskfapped, on 06/29/2008, -1/+5"Life is a joke, enjoy."
    
    Correction: *Your* life is a joke.
- Raphae1, on 06/28/2008, -0/+6I highly recommend to do so. Goto
  http://digg.com/politics/Guantanamo_Bay_and_Interr ...
  click on the flash-video button, skip to 1:45 and
  watch attorney Yoo lie. First he claims he can't talk about conversations and later he claims, that he can't remember any such conversation. Wait a minute! If he can't remember any such conversation, why does he claim, that he can't talk about it, in the first place?
- FreeTalkLIve, on 06/28/2008, -0/+3I saw some nice titties on C-Span once. They were showing examples of violence and nudity on TV ....like on the TV.
  
  I bet that ***** is on Youtube somewhere.
- SquigglyP, on 06/29/2008, -0/+4When I watch TV, that's usually what I watch.
  
  Some of those guys are actually pretty damn entertaining.
lapdogs, on 06/28/2008, -6/+15Gee, I wonder if Al Queda read the New York Times when Judith Miller was spewing her propaganda or when Bob Novak was telling Osama been Forgotten who he should be on the look-out for, regarding CIA Covert Agents?
InsideJob11Sep, on 06/28/2008, -17/+38FOX is a CIA/NSA propaganda conduit to brainwash the sheeple!
- masterm1nd, on 06/28/2008, -16/+9Good thing you sleep in a pile of tin foil.
- haydesigner, on 06/28/2008, -5/+18It is just too hard to anyone seriously when they use the word "sheeple".
  - MasterGrief, on 06/28/2008, -1/+11Nothing says noisy armchair rebel quite like the use of sheeple does.
  - masterm1nd, on 06/28/2008, -5/+2And when you make a ***** crazy claim with zero supporting evidence.
  - noen, on 06/28/2008, -2/+2Are sheeple tasty? What would you recommend, BBQ? Or maybe a Jamaican marinade?
- leakus, on 06/29/2008, -2/+5No reason to look for a conspiracy, "InsideJob11Sep". FOX only broadcasts what certain people want to see. Of course it is false and misleading, but some just don't want to watch real news. FOX is just tapping the market of the ignorant who want self assurance of their point of view.
  - Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -0/+3Rupert Murdock has admitted he willingly did propaganda. It was on digg a few weeks back.
    
    This is in the realm of conspiracy fact now, not conspiracy theory.
- Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -0/+1I'm not so sure the CIA/NSA and the White House's interestes always coincide. Remember Rumsfeld and Cheney made an end-run around the CIA in 02-03 and did their own intelligence because the CIA wan't giving them exactly the kind of information they wanted on Iraq.
  Fox may be the direct mouthpiece of this administration.
  
  I wish I knew more about our government's internal politics so I could say for sure.
InsideJob11Sep, on 06/28/2008, -29/+6FOX is a CIA/NSA propaganda conduit to brainwash the sheeple!
- jrburkh, on 06/28/2008, -3/+1That sounds like propaganda to me, buried.
mrcoderga, on 06/28/2008, -6/+53I am upset that al Qaeda is watching Fox, and liking what they see. Both are fundamentalist radicals bent on destroying the rule of law in the United States.
swatward, on 06/28/2008, -6/+16Fox isn't news. Stop acknowledging their existence and they will probably just go away.
- PhilLesh69, on 06/29/2008, -0/+3No, unfortunately, that won't make them go away.
  
  They know how to appeal to a demographic of low intelligence, ill informed viewers. They use lots of flashy graphics to keep their attention, and they don't delve into complex issues because they know their audience can't grasp or understand anything other than simplistic, black and white issues of so-called life and death importance.
  
  Fear is an emotional thing. They don't bother with logic and reason, because those take intelligence. Emotion is the easiest way to reach their target audience.
CalmBlueOcean, on 06/28/2008, -8/+15Al-Qaeda might be the ONLY people watching C-SPAN.
- bjornski, on 06/28/2008, -5/+9What?
  
  Not enough explosions and boobs for you?
  - BoSuu, on 06/28/2008, -8/+1What?
    
    You seriously would watch c-span over The Dark Knight? ***** off
  - bjornski, on 06/29/2008, -0/+4Yes, because I prefer intelligence to pop culture.
  - Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -1/+2You seriously made a conscious decision to ignore current events in favor of entertaining yourself?
    
    ***** off, you're the reason our country is in the state its in.
  - diggerphelps, on 06/29/2008, -1/+1Al Qaeda's watching The Hills (Waziristan Edition) and Regis just like everybody else.
- Pillage, on 06/29/2008, -3/+2and their supporters.
  - bjornski, on 06/29/2008, -2/+1Sorry, the viewers with the biggest boner for attacking Iran watch FOX.
    
    Al Queda LOVES Fox. It fits their agenda 100%.
  - Pillage, on 06/30/2008, -0/+1Fox news is full of stories about killing terrorists told to you by busty news anchors. How do you not get a boner?
flashback99, on 06/28/2008, -4/+11They actually believe their own fear tactics.
- PhilLesh69, on 06/29/2008, -0/+2Yeah, any intelligent person who used to be a fan of that channel should have figured it out when they tried to link the california wildfires, last fall, to al-qaeda.
swatward, on 06/28/2008, -3/+7also, (no pun intended). Maybe maddox had a point.
birdly, on 06/28/2008, -3/+23By this reasoning, we shouldn't have newspapers of any kind because the boogeymen might get subscriptions.
- altgeeky1, on 06/28/2008, -3/+7Duh. Bogeymen fear open government.
  
  Not sure if you were referring internal forces - the fascists in office now, external forces - al Queda. Both seem hellbent on prodding the USA into a bankrupt police state, so I'm not sure the distinction matters much.
- Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -1/+3You laugh, but that argument was used fairly frequently during WWII.
  
  (For the record, I am not in favor of censorship for security purposes, just making the point.)
  - PhilLesh69, on 06/29/2008, -0/+4But finish the idea -- the argument was made, and it never held any traction during WWII, because people back then understood what their nation stood for, and refused to give up anything to the enemy during that struggle.
  - Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -0/+4Yes, you're absolutely right.
4square, on 06/28/2008, -5/+7Must be hard to keep up such a level of outrage.
- PhilLesh69, on 06/29/2008, -0/+2It's easy. Stop thinking, and just watch a lot of Fox News Channel. Be afraid of brown people, and believe that the next terror attack is going to be in your little backwater town out in the boondocks.
Stryder81, on 06/28/2008, -7/+14Geraldo said it best at the end saying " No, Some people are paranoid "
lucutus, on 06/28/2008, -3/+6this kind of crap just further convinces me that the USA is headed for a revolution. Those who are not afraid will rise up and revolt with force if this path of excessive government control and censorship continues.
- macweirdo42, on 06/28/2008, -9/+3The majority are demanding this level of government control and censorship. What the heck are you babbling on about? You can't have a revolution against the will of the people.
  - lucutus, on 06/28/2008, -4/+10The majority is borderline retarded. The minority is web savvy and getting educated. Just wait and see what the upcoming generations do when they become the majority.
  - Stevanoski, on 06/28/2008, -3/+5@macweirdo42, not by lame slackers like you. As long as it is only your type we have to "lead" the revolution then there are no worries.
  - sphira, on 06/28/2008, -2/+3macweirdo
    "The majority are demanding this level of government control"
    
    I don't think were quite there yet -- but close
    
    "What the heck are you babbling on about"
    
    unnecessary and unwarranted --
    
    What he wrote was on point and salient -
    
    Maybe another dimension should be considered -
    How the majority is counted -
    
    What is a majority in such a watered down nation, and at what point do you consider the thinning elements unworthy of a placeholder in the count.
  - Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -0/+3Revolutionaries have never been a majority. Not in any revolution in the history of the world.
- jawagas, on 06/28/2008, -0/+5You Lucutus, though I respect your right to an opinion, are surely a babbling idiot. This discussion is no different than a handful of stoners explaining the true nature of consciousness; to leave that debate with a new found sense of understanding government censorship means there is something wrong with your brain. These people are not journalists, they are in the entertainment buisness(I.E. Geraldo). Regardless of lack of taste and intelligence, fox and The Grudge 2 still seem to make money.
tinko, on 06/28/2008, -5/+4Obama promotes C-SPAN:
8:50 http://youtube.com/watch?v=0alzsH029PU
- Archer007, on 06/28/2008, -0/+2I was so sure that was a rickroll.
willdelaney, on 06/28/2008, -30/+18================================D
penis strike
diggthis123, on 06/28/2008, -3/+8What a paranoid douchebag
Biker803, on 06/28/2008, -7/+41Dear Fox,

STFU.

Signed,
The Digg Community
STKD, on 06/28/2008, -1/+7LMAE!

Damn, apparently I can't say it...
PontifexMaximus, on 06/28/2008, -1/+14c-span is the only legitimate NEWS that exists in this country besides Jim Lehr. haha. Al Qaeda will be more educated than most Americans.
whataboutdave, on 06/28/2008, -1/+21It's not like C-SPAN broadcasts online for free or anything...

http://www.c-span.org/

C-SPAN is a great tool for transparent government.
Evangelical, on 06/28/2008, -21/+2He does have a point.
- PontifexMaximus, on 06/28/2008, -1/+16No he doesn't. Excellent debate Evangelical.
- digitalpencil, on 06/28/2008, -0/+14^^I wouldn't worry about him, this is the same guy that thinks Blizzard are witches and is lobbying New York to pass an 'anti-evolution' law. Read his posts, seriously, they're ***** hilarious!!
- diggerphelps, on 06/29/2008, -0/+1y head.
- newsound6, on 06/29/2008, -0/+2So what, We should ban C-span to protect America? You would actually argue that we should get rid of the one single source the American people have to see the inner workings of their government without any bias? So we should have a 100% secretive government in hopes it keeps you safe from the turrists? Hell we should cancel voting, we don't want the terrorists knowing who our president is, or they might hurt him! My God, I hope you reply.
doommachine, on 06/28/2008, -1/+17They started watching Fox News once the "Terrorist Fist Jab" comment aired. Now Fox News has taken place of their normal comedy programming.
SoulSk8er74, on 06/28/2008, -2/+9Fox is outraged that Al-Qaeda is watching C-Span!? Well, it could be worse... they could actually be covering the presidential election in a fair and serious manner...
mrfreeziexp, on 06/28/2008, -2/+3Ahh, the beginning of the end of CSPAN and a transparent gov.
- PontifexMaximus, on 06/28/2008, -0/+3Wait, which transparent government are you talking about? I seem to have misplaced mine.
- Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -0/+1Nah, C-Span isn't going anywhere.
OC73, on 06/28/2008, -5/+5Only an idiot would doubt that our enemies pay attention to our media.
- haydesigner, on 06/28/2008, -1/+4So by that logic, you would support banning all media in the US then?
  - OC73, on 06/28/2008, -5/+3Where did I indicate that that was my logic? The point I was making was our politicians and media should be more responsible with the information they disclose. Many lives are at stake.
  - SquigglyP, on 06/29/2008, -1/+3if that's your point, then you're wrong, to a certain extent. This particular subject is one of importance to us, because depending on what these secret interrogation techniques are, the US could be in violation of international law, and the people who know about this could be subject to war crimes charges and crimes against humanity.
    
    The fact that there is doubt about the legality of what we are doing to prisoners, and the fact that they are systematically refusing to disclose information to the people of this country - the very people these politicians are supposed to be serving - lends a great deal of weight to the idea that there is something very wrong going on.
    
    The plain fact that they keep adding more and more layers of bureaucracy between us and the truth should be a great big red warning flag to every single citizen in this country who would like to continue living in a truely free society. We are supposed to know what our government is doing, and yet through the actions of not only this president, but those of various presidents and congresses since at least the civil war, the every day functions of this government have become hidden beneath layers of secrecy which have become more and more complex and labyrinthine. Not a week goes by when some story pops up about how some agent or officer screws up royally due to some simple bit of intelligence or some report they never saw because it spent a year and a half in some department it wasn't supposed to have been in in the first place. The people who work in government can't even navigate the red tape in their own departments.
    
    And somehow clods like you think adding that one final layer will fix everything. Yeah, the Department of Homeland Security is a great idea. Let's take our failing intelligence systems and put one more obstacle in it's path through which the information has to filter. Homeland Security should have been named "The Department of Government Cover-ups", since that's basically all it's done since it's creation. "Oops, we accidentally deleted the evidence you needed during our investigation. Sorry!"
- Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -2/+1It's a damn good thing then that Al Qaeda doesn't exist.
SwordofKahless, on 06/28/2008, -8/+1Whether the hearings should be opened or closed is legitimately open for debate. One has to question the motives sparking the outrage here on digg since if you believe this subject is not open for any debate then you have no concern about U.S. national security.
- FTWmovin2canada, on 06/28/2008, -1/+3That's right, we're all outraged digg terrorists. Wow.
Stevanoski, on 06/28/2008, -12/+3Any American would be outraged that a congressman would target a government employee to the enemy as was done by a....guess.....Democrat. And smile like a fox while making it plain he hoped that employee would be killed by the Islamic Terrorists.
- rationalbeats, on 06/28/2008, -2/+8***** You
  - OC73, on 06/28/2008, -5/+2You're angry and offered up nothing in return because you know he's right.
  - rationalbeats, on 06/28/2008, -4/+3A sitting Congressman wants to assist Al-Queda assassinate a former Bush admin official?
    
    ***** You Too.
  - Stevanoski, on 06/28/2008, -5/+1Your well thought out reply reflects well on you and your friends. With leaders like you I can see why Americans point at the Left and laugh.
- SquigglyP, on 06/29/2008, -1/+1Yeah! How dare he try to find out if the government is doing anything illegal! It's not like it's his job or anything!!
  
  Oh... wait...
  
  No, really... several thousand of our troops lost for a war we should never have started, and that's just excused away with "Well that's what happens in a war!", but the thought of ONE GUY being targeted for divulging information relating to possible war crimes committed in our names - which would have been at least partially this guy's fault in the first place - that's just going too far. Seriously, if the worst we are doing to people over there is the stuff that's already been claimed to have been done, then what's the worry? If the stuff we are doing over there is WORSE than what they've claimed they were doing, then the resulting situation for him would be 1) become a victim of a terrorist plot or 2) be tried and sentenced to life in prison or death for war crimes. Either ***** way, the guy would be completely screwed. I wonder why he's not too eager to talk.
bwa236, on 06/28/2008, -1/+4what is is with Foxnews hosts taking charge on the shows and making fools of the whole network by trying desperately to making a mountain out of a mole-hill. I can't imagine even Murdoch is happy with this sort of trash.
While I may not agree with Geraldo on certain things, one thing I like about the guy is he'll respond sensibly to fools on the air, taking a stance like "why are you trying to make this a big deal." I am sure he's dissatisfied with the direction journalism has gone in his time.
rationalbeats, on 06/28/2008, -2/+13Only cowards and fascist live in this world view. What an embarrassment to our nation.
theghoul, on 06/28/2008, -2/+11Do they make this ***** up as they go or what?
- jellygraph, on 06/28/2008, -0/+7Yep, but its all determiend by the folks who run Fox... what the message of the day should be
TheRhinoceros, on 06/28/2008, -1/+14This guy is an idiot. How can you say in this day and age that Al-qaeda would not know what this schmuck Addington looks like? I can go to google images and pull up hundreds of images of this man on the web. I can look him up on wikipedia. I can look him up on youtube. He's out there. Quit riffing, Doogie Howser.

Who cares how al-qaeda gets their info. They are gonna get what info they want regardless of what addington, c-span, fox, Who the hell ever this schmuck is,or anyone else does. Addington's name is out there. Hell, I'm sure mine is too. Gonna freak if Al-qaeda gets me? NFL = Not Friggin Likely. Calm down, Doogie Howser.

Somebody needs to smack this moron. Somebody needs to smack his boss for putting him in front of a camera and letting him speak.

election-coverage.com
gr8nash, on 06/28/2008, -12/+2Did you guys even watch the footage your commenting on? You guys just love getting on your liberal soap boxes with your liberal friends and patting each other on the back. That interview Brian was sucking wind about was awful. There was nothing professional about it. WHERE ARE ANY INDEPENDENT THINKERS? Right-wigers == Left-wingers they are just as bad, no room for other opinions or the thought that maybe they dont know it all.
- noen, on 06/28/2008, -0/+4I've seen it. It's just Fox ***** attempting to justify torture. Addington is a war criminal of the first order who is openly contemptuous of congress. Congress is constitutionally mandated to conduct oversight hearings. Especially since there are allegations of torture.
orenshk, on 06/28/2008, -3/+6He's just pissed they're not watching him.
AsylumAleikum, on 06/28/2008, -9/+2Congressman Delahunt is glad that he helped expose the face of a government employee to Al Qaeda. Do I have to tell you that Delahunt is a DemocRAT?
- yakski, on 06/29/2008, -0/+3Wow... what a moronic response....... Anybody who wanted to know who the hell he was could have googled him once and gotten 1000 times the information aired in that meeting... that meeting where Addington LIED about what he knows and evaded the questions... Guess you could care less about the corruption that reeks out of that man and instead want to make it look like he is some kind of victim... That friggin moron has victimized 300million Americans by making torture the new American tradition, by promoting inhuman treatment of human beings and by helping destroy the little remnants left of the Constitution.
reechme, on 06/28/2008, -2/+5Dugg for the hysterical fact that even Al Queada must thing that Fox News is vile ;)
munen123, on 06/28/2008, -5/+8fox news is for morons
DiggGeek24, on 06/28/2008, -5/+1Good maybe the govt will shutdown the propaganda FOX, CNN, MSNBC and we can get real news.
- DiggGeek24, on 06/28/2008, -3/+1Im being dugg my little Fox news sheeps you must like govt propaganda
kds405, on 06/28/2008, -2/+4What are they talking about? Islamic extremists 18-49 are a key demo.
nem0, on 06/28/2008, -3/+6Hey Brian Kilmeade, if you hate freedom and democracy so much, why don't you go live in a country like Iran or North Korea? Here in the US we have the right to know how decisions are made in government.
Phillycat81, on 06/28/2008, -4/+6When is someone from FOX news not outraged?
chrismurphy, on 06/28/2008, -2/+9+1 for Geraldo for saying some people are just paranoid and want to restrict the press and free society.

-1 for Geraldo cluelessly saying that Democrats are going to go after Republicans. This is collection of Democrats that can't prevent anything Bush and Republicans have desired. Torture, spying, retroactive immunity for telecoms, Iraq, attorney's scandal, the list goes on. There's nothing Democrats have been willing to hold Bush or Republicans accountable for. It's simply absurd to suggest they're suddenly going to become competent in the next Congress.
Stevanoski, on 06/28/2008, -11/+13Love it that such a little cable news company, Fox, gets so much air time here on digg. The Left here on digg are like the little piggies of Animal Farm. They must control everything.
- moolaismyfriend, on 06/28/2008, -14/+8Hey look at the white trash redneck who wants to pretend he loves America by using bumper sticker talking points.
  
  Why do you hate America *****?
  - Stevanoski, on 06/29/2008, -6/+9Wow, well thought out reply moo. Have you been practicing in front of the mirror? Oh, wait, that is the same reply to spam to all my comments. oink oink.
  - EIderofzion, on 06/29/2008, -1/+1Hey look at cornfed rich white boy trashing lower classed whites,(secretly hates himself?) while at the same time trashing his own country. A luxury 99% of the people of the globe DO NOT ENJOY!
- DrunkTomato, on 06/28/2008, -10/+4you're an idiot. FOX is not a "little cable news company", it is a giant company and a major source of information for many people. What is unfortunate and morally wrong is that most of these people (not to mention their intended audience) are weak-minded and easily manipulated... like yourself.
  - Stevanoski, on 06/29/2008, -4/+9psssst, I have an idea, don't watch Fox, then your little noggin won't hurt as much. And it only has an audience of 2 million so it is very small.
- BillE3, on 06/28/2008, -1/+4As the famous line went "everyone is equal, some are more equal than others". Not smarter, just more equal.
- EIderofzion, on 06/29/2008, -0/+2Yes and they are alike them in other ways too,, they become everything they started out against. I certainly hope their messiah turns out to be more of a Snowball than Napoleon.
ShaoKahn, on 06/28/2008, -3/+11Al Qaeda is like a boogie man child story.
- Scottc320, on 06/29/2008, -3/+2Tell that to the people that died on 9/11
  - Hangly, on 06/29/2008, -0/+6Dear people who died on 9/11;
    
    Your government murdered you, and used your deaths as justification to launch two (perhaps soon three) illegal wars in which nearly a million people died. Also the perpetrators have nearly torn to shreds the founding documents and ideals of your country.
    Being dead, you probably already know that. If I were you I would haunt the ***** out of the White House and Congress. (If you've seen Poltergeist or the Hellraiser series you know the stuff I'm talking about.)
    
    If you can catch up with God sometime (maybe during his break,) tell him that you're angry as hell, and you want him to make with some of those Old Testament wrath-of-the-Almighty-style punishments.
    
    For what it's worth, we who survived you are kind of disorganized at the moment, but eventually we will get our ***** together and exact some revenge of our own on your bahalf.
    
    Sincerely,
    America
  - mvlazysusan, on 06/29/2008, -0/+3victims families want a new investigation
    they think bush was part of it
    most other countries think so to
bjiggs, on 06/28/2008, -8/+1blah blah blah. we hate fox. blah blah blah.

This is pathetic
amightywind, on 06/28/2008, -3/+1"DELAHUNT: Right. Well, I’m sure they are watching, and I’m glad they finally have a chance to see you, Mr. Addington."
Isn't this a crime on Delahunt's part?
Show 51 - 73 of 73 discussions
Login or register to add a comment

Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.

Fox Hosts Outraged Al Qaeda Might Watch C-SPAN

Login or register to add a comment